Movement is expressive. I've never denied that. I don't think there's such a thing as abstract dance.
Dancing has a continuity of its own that need not be dependent upon either the rise or fall of sound or the pitch and cry of words. Its force of feeling lies in the physical image, fleeting or static.
I don't like teaching, because it's so repetitive - especially the beginning of class, which is always more or less the same and has to be carefully done. It's tedious. But I know it's necessary for dancers to keep working on technique.
You can get fixed ideas, and it can get restrictive. So, I try to put myself in a precarious position.
It is upon the length and breadth and span of a body sustained in muscular action that dance invokes its image.
I think the thing that we agreed to so many years ago, actually, was that the music didn't have to support the dance nor the dance illustrate the music, but they could be two things going on at the same time.
